To Top

Five Types Of Exercise: Which Is Best?

With a barbell, while training without the help of assistants, you have only one choice regarding the type of exercise… you are restricted to a “normal” type of exercise, movements involving both positive and negative work.

But if assistants are available, then you have a wider choice. If the weight is lifted for you, then you can restrict your exercise to “negative-only” work.

Or… if you lift the barbell, and it is then lowered by your helpers, you can limit your exercise to “positive-only” work.

AND…if you are training with an exercise machine, you can lift the weight with two arms (or two legs) and lower it with one arm (or one leg). Thus, providing “negative accentuated” work.

Until recently, those four types of exercise were the only choices available…     (1) normal, (2) negative-only, (3) Positive-only or (4) negative accentuated. But now, a fifth type of exercise has been added to the list of choices…HYPER, a new type of exercise involving both positive and negative work, and providing absolutely maximum levels of intensity during both the lifting and lowering of the weight.

At this point in time (September of 1973), little or nothing is yet known about the results of training with this new type of exercise… so the real value of such a type of training remains unproven. However, certain basic points related to this new type of exercise are already clearly established; so we can, at least, examine these known factors in the light of simple logic.

ONE…for the purpose of increasing muscular size and strength, the results of exercise are closely related to the intensity of work. Low intensity exercise will do little or nothing in the way of increasing strength, regardless of the amount of exercise performed…medium intensity exercise will increase strength, by slowly and only up a certain, limited point…high intensity exercise is an absolute requirement for producing rapid and large-scale strength increases, and it appears that the higher the intensity, the better the results.

HYPER exercises provide maximum possible intensity of exercise, during both the positive and negative parts of the work; so it would appear to be logical to assume that hyper exercises are better than other types of exercise for the purpose of stimulating growth.

Which is certainly an important consideration…but not the ONLY consideration. Low intensity exercise is almost worthless for the purpose of increasing strength, simply because it does very little if anything in the way of STIMULATING growth. So it logically follows that hyper exercises, by providing maximum intensity, should produce maximum growth stimulation.

Muscular growth is produced only when two factors are involved …growth must be STIMULATED, but it must also be PERMITTED.

A resting body does not grow in a complete lack of exercise; on the contrary, in a state of total inactivity, muscular size and strength is quickly lost.

AND…exercised muscles do not grow unless growth is permitted by proper rest. In fact, the results of overwork are very similar to the results of total inactivity…losses in muscular size and strength.

Proper exercise must be of high intensity in order to stimulated growth… but it must also be brief and infrequent in order to permit growth.

Hyper exercises raise the level of intensity to a point that was never before possible in a practical manner, if at all…so growth stimulation should also be greater than ever. But it is also true that high intensity exercised impose a higher level of demands upon the overall recovery ability of the body, and it remains to be seen just what effect this will have on the ability of the body to grow.

If we can judge by previous experience, then the use of hyper exercises will require a great reduction in the amount of training…because, when the intensity of exercise is increased, the amount of exercise must be reduced. When you train harder, you must train less…and you have no choice in the matter.


Caption 1:

Here is the remarkable physique of Mike Dayton, who placed fourth in the Mr. U.S.A. contest, further illustrating the fact that it takes a very remarkable physique to win this title Mike certainly is one of the greatest on the scene today. He is a former Mr. Teenage winner. Photo by Klemens.


Instantized Creatine- Gains In Bulk

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

More in Arthur Jones

  • What is the best curling machine for developing the biceps?

    Q: What is the best curling machine for developing the biceps? A: If you had asked Nautilus inventor Author Jones that...

    Charles PoliquinMarch 4, 2016
  • Q&A: Nautilus Cams, Barbell Rows, Straps and More

    Q: Why did Arthur Jones use the name Nautilus for his machinery? A: Here’s Jones’ own explanation: “Well, according to Webster’s,...

    Stuart McRobertOctober 22, 2011
  • Arthur Jones and the Upper-Body Squat

    Q: Was Arthur Jones the father of high-intensity exercise? A: No, but he was its most visible and effective proponent....

    Stuart McRobertOctober 21, 2011
  • Hard Way

    Arthur Jones on intensity.

    Arthur JonesApril 1, 2001
  • Average Expectations From Training

    “How much can I gain – how fast?” An impossible question, obviously – far too many factors are involved for even...

    Arthur JonesMay 17, 1974
  • The Colorado Experiment

    The following is a brief, preliminary report of an experiment conducted at Colorado State University in  May of 1973.  A detailed,...

    Arthur JonesSeptember 14, 1973
  • The Best Kind of Exercise

    Exercise is capable of producing a wide variety of results – increases In strength, improvements in flexibility, greater cardiovascular ability (or...

    Arthur JonesMay 12, 1973
  • The Facts Are…

    The fact is… weight training is more productive than any other type of exercise, but why? Because it is HARDER than...

    Arthur JonesMarch 27, 1973
  • The Beginning or The End

    Voting for politicians that tell you what you want to hear has all but destroyed civilization- giving in to outrage in...

    Arthur JonesMay 2, 1972